On 08/22/2012 07:18 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
A sentence or two documenting the custodian behavior for connection
pools might be useful.
The behavior is what you'd expect if you considered it, but, at least in
my anecdote, I took a while to consider it.
I've added notes to both 'connection-pool' and 'virtual-connection'
about how they interact with custodians.
Your initial experience sounds like a bug, though; it sounds like the
connection didn't know it had been disconnected. What was the underlying
kind of connection?
BTW, I am really liking the "db" collection.
Thanks!
Ryan
Matthias Felleisen wrote at 08/21/2012 07:09 PM:
Are you saying that Ryan should add an appropriate warning to the
documentation? -- Matthias
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
When using the "db" collection's "connection-pool" procedure,
important safety tip: it uses the "current-custodian" from the
context in which "connection-pool" is applied.
[...]
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
