I'm really enjoying the new (~a ...) formatting forms, but I'm wondering about a workaround for this minor irritation:
When I call (error...), I typically use the form that includes the function name. However, this form treats its second argument as a format string, not as a message. This means that if I want to use this form, I have to write: (error 'my-proc "~a" (~a "You messed up, "name".")) I suppose I could use the more concise: (error (~a "my-proc: You messed up,"name".")) ... but I feel like I'm losing information by gluing the function name into the message prematurely. Am I missing something obvious? Aside from just using raise-argument-error more often? John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
