FWIW, big GCs are usually multiple seconds. But minor collections are in that neighborhood and those happen more randomly when running inside DrRacket.
Robby On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've had good success running DrRacket and selecting "No debugging or >> profiling" and deselecting "Preserve stacktrace" in the Language dialog. >> Most of the time, I get performance similar to command-line Racket. I think >> the only significant difference between running a module in that environment >> and running it using command-line Racket is that in DrRacket, GC pauses tend >> to be longer because there's a larger heap. > > hmmmm... every time I tried, in the past, I got significantly slower > times in DrRacket, with "No debugging" and "no stacktrace". > > In this particular occasion I obtained around 20s when I tried in > DrRacket the first time. Then, I got always around 10s. > > Probably I hit a big gc the first time. hmmmm... > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
