Should I use the bug reporting machinery for small things like this one, which I assume there will be a bunch in the new docs?
Better a private mail to Neil? P. On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll fix the type of `processor-count' and change the math docs. > > Neil ⊥ > > > On 12/12/2012 08:16 AM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> But it could be elided for the docs. >> >> Robby >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:33 AM, J. Ian Johnson <i...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>> >>> I imagine that's there more for Typed Racket's sake. >>> -Ian >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <olopie...@gmail.com> >>> To: "Neil Toronto" <neil.toro...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: users@racket-lang.org >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:17:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada >>> Eastern >>> Subject: Re: [racket] Math library ready for testing >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've just pushed the last commits that make the new math library ready >>>> for >>>> wider testing. Almost everything ready for use is documented, the tests >>>> keep >>>> passing, and everything *seems* to work. >>> >>> >>> (max-math-threads) → Positive-Integer >>> (max-math-threads num) → void? >>> num : Positive-Integer >>> >>> The maximum number of threads a parallelized math function will >>> use. >>> The default value is (max 1 (processor-count))." >>> >>> Isn't (max 1 (processor-count)) the same as (processor-count) ? >>> >>> Or does Racket runs on machines with less than 1 processors? 8^) >>> >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>> >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
