On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> I thought Limbo Peng wanted to measure the transliteration of some Go 
> algorithm. Wasn't there a remark somewhere that said "there is a faster 
> algorithm based on union-find"?


Oh!  I'm sorry.  I didn't even look at that part of Peng's email, and
missed the comment on a faster algorithm.  I had no idea what
"quick-find" or "quick-union" were.
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to