On 10/02/2013 18:34, Matthias Felleisen wrote:

more). While Racket obviously inherits many traits from Scheme and while
we are obviously grateful to the Scheme branch of the family for its
inspiration, Racket is NOT Scheme and we will continue to develop the
language as we see fit.

I'm happy to read that.
We are all fans of the principles of Scheme and Lisp. But Racket is taking us so much further and deserves a road-map of its own.

-Patrick

____________________
 Racket Users list:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to