Those turn out to be `size_t's. Robby helped me grep the rest, and it looks like there are no `_size's in Planet.
Google turns up one binding of `_size' for me: https://github.com/veer-public/machine-learning/blob/master/gsl/gsl-ffi.rkt Veer: any opinion on whether we should break your code? :) At Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:39:47 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > ryanc/db.plt jaymccarthy/opencl.plt and jaymccarthy/zeromq.plt all have it. > I stopped searching at that point. > > Robby > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones <to...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote: > > > On 2013-02-10 9:00 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > > I think that's likely to be right for all platforms where Racket runs, > > > but we should define it in one place. > > > > Cool. > > > > > Should we add `_size' to `ffi/unsafe', risking collisions with existing > > > code? > > > > This sounds best to me. (And while I think it should be _size_t, that > > would be inconsistent with the existing _uintXY etc. Hmm. Never mind.) > > > > There is no _size identifier in any of the current Racket codebase, so > > no collisions there. Does anyone have a full greppable snapshot of > > planet to check? > > > > Cheers, > > Tony > > ____________________ > > Racket Users list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
