Thanks --- knowing that it looks like a frozen process instead of a memory fault is useful.
If you start DrRacket in a terminal as racket -l drracket then, when DrRacket get stuck again, there's a small chance that typing Ctl-C in the terminal will produce a useful context listing. It's probably worth a try, anyway. At Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:29:19 -0800, Joe Gilray wrote: > No problem, Matthew, I know that I've been less-than-specific, here's what > I can say: > > Since 5.3.2, I've seen about 7 crashes, they all act the same: Win7 > suddenly says "the program is not responding". At least twice it's > happened when I hit the debugger button in DrRacket. Otherwise it feels > random (at least once when clicking on the definitions window, at least > once when simply running a program in the interactions pane). > > Thanks, > -Joe > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > > FWIW, I'm not ignoring your reports of crashes on 64-bit Windows, but I > > haven't yet done enough work on it. I'm still looking for a way to > > provoke crashes, and the thought that the debugger might be relevant is > > helpful. > > > > At Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:08:59 -0800, Joe Gilray wrote: > > > I had a problem with my test code that led me to believe that the 64-bit > > > version of 5.3.3 was faster than the 32-bit version... to paraphrase SNL > > > from the good old days: "never mind." > > > > > > I still do see crashes on the 64-bit version and not on 32-bit: The > > > crashes still seem random, but do seem to occur more often in the > > debugger. > > > > > > Regards, > > > -Joe > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Has anyone else noticed that the 64-bit version on Win7 is faster than > > the > > > > 32-bit version? > > > > > > > > I thought that the longer pointers were supposed to slow down > > execution. > > > > > > > > BTW, still seeing some crashes on 64-bit and none on 32-bit > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks Racketeers, > > > >> > > > >> I am still seeing crashes on Win7 64bit with 5.3.3. About every 6 > > hours > > > >> or so I get "program not responding" (doesn't seem to correlate to > > anything > > > >> in particular). > > > >> > > > >> Haven't seen it on Win7 32 bit. > > > >> > > > >> -Joe > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Racket version 5.3.3 is now available from > > > >>> > > > >>> http://racket-lang.org/ > > > >>> > > > >>> This is a bug-fix release to address a flaw in DrRacket v5.3.2 > > > >>> concerning interactions between the contour window and the syntax > > > >>> coloring. > > > >>> > > > >>> Feedback Welcome, > > > >>> -- > > > >>> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli > > Barzilay: > > > >>> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is > > Life! > > > >>> ____________________ > > > >>> Racket Users list: > > > >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > ____________________ > > > Racket Users list: > > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
