On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:40:23PM -0600, Brian Mastenbrook wrote: > What is the expected behavior of module resolution when symlinking a > Racket program, particularly one executed as a script using a shebang
I think Racket is doing the right thing here. If it did what you seem to be expecting, then a working setup would break when replacing a non-symlinked file with a symlink to a file with the same contents in another directory. I don't think Racket should be trying to defeat the abstraction mechanism that symlinks provide. I'd like to offer an alternative solution for you but I'm not sure I understand your requirements exactly. Can't you just use a shell script? Something like: #!/bin/sh exec racket /path/to/foo/foo.rkt "$@" David ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
