> > One way to avoid this problem is instead of module+ use module*: > > (module* test racket ;; To test module-boundary contracts, must use > ;; module* and (require (submod "..")). > (require (submod "..")) > ... check check check ... > )
Yup! A similar question had been asked on Stack Overflow too:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14718296/confused-about-racket-contracts/14718633#14718633
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
