I just pushed this and made rackunit, eli-tester, and raco test use it. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like the idea of an optional N/M passed message that could also be used in > raco test to signal a status. If someone could take on this task, that would > be wonderful. > > > > > On Mar 21, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > > I didn't mean to suggest obligatory output. > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Diogo F. S. Ramos <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I think that would be a great solution. We could also put that call >> > into 'taco test' with an optional switch or as the default if it were >> > popular and/or not rackunit-specific >> > >> > Jay >> > >> > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013, Robby Findler wrote: >> > >> > Rackunit could probably provide some kind of summary information >> > for these top-level tests that could then be queried (via an extra >> > call that a rackunit programmer puts at the end of the last test >> > file) to determine how to exit. >> > >> > >> > I know that I wish there were some kind of summary "you passed N >> > tests" instead of silence when nothing fails. >> >> I don't know if I'm understanding you correctly, but it's a normal >> behavior for tools to be silent if everything went OK. >> >> Adding some obligatory output seems to make the life harder for those >> who want to use `raco test' as a tool. > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > >
-- Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
