I think it would make sense to add an option to `scribble/doclang2' (and `scribble/doclang') to replace `decode'. I've added that to my to-do list, in case no one gets to it first.
At Sun, 26 May 2013 15:42:52 -0700, Matthew Butterick wrote: > When you use scribble/doclang2 in a submodule, it provides the textual > content of the submodule with the symbol 'doc. However, it first passes the > content through the scribble decoder. > > I'd like to get the behavior of scribble/doclang2, but without the decode > step (so I just get the raw textual content from 'doc.) > > I cloned the source for scribble/doclang and scribble/doclang2 under new > names and just yanked out the call to decode. That worked. > > But I'm wondering if there's a more elegant way of circumventing decode. > > Scribble/doclang2 allows you to set a #:post-process step, but only after > decode. > > Also, scribble/text is not the answer, because it can't be used as a > submodule language. > > Thanks. > > Matthew Butterick > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
