It could be less dense if he turned his comments into useless whitespace. Notice the lack of comments in most other submissions. -Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthias Felleisen" <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> To: "Sean Kanaley" <skana...@gmail.com> Cc: "Racket Users" <users@racket-lang.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:42:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [racket] Rosetta Sokoban Solution
Thank you for this effort. This is not a criticism of your code but I will say that Racket code looks dense and overbearing compared to PicoLisp, Python, and Tcl. Hmph. On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Sean Kanaley wrote: > The rather empty page on Sokoban now has a Racket solution. The creator is > proud to announce it's the fastest solution (though a couple didn't give run > times) at ~0.1 seconds. My thanks to Ryan Culpepper for making the binary > heap that made this possible. > > http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Sokoban#Racket > > Also, Racket is one short of Python in popularity. If someone could do two > more we'll defeat those lazy Python programmers, probably with less work! > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
