Thanks Sam Maybe someone ;-) can use 'box-cas!' to devise an optimistic locking scheme; my approach was pessimistic. Go shows off multiple approaches.
Dan On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote: > You might find the 'box-cas!' procedure useful for this -- it performs an > atomic update on a single box. > > Sam > On Jun 15, 2013 9:16 PM, "Daniel Prager" <daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I've added my Racket solution to the Atomic Updates task. See >> >> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Atomic_updates >> >> I'd be interested in suggestions on how to improve this solution, >> especially by drawing on existing facilities in Racket to construct a more >> elegant approach (or approaches) than the hand-rolled locks that I employed. >> >> -- Dan >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >>
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
