Here is an update: I rewrote gcd and used a hash-table for the squares check. The hash-table change sped up the sequential code about 10x! Then I tried using future / touch and it seems to improve the performance a little, but there is quite a bit of blocking (on >= and hash-ref) still.
New code below. -Joe ; function that searches for progressive numbers for a given range of b values (define (find-progressive-num2 b-start b-end b-incr lim ht) (define (mgcd a b) (if (= b 0) a (mgcd b (modulo a b)))) (for/sum ([b (in-range b-start b-end b-incr)]) (let loopa ([a (add1 b)] [suma 0]) (cond [(> (mgcd a b) 1) (loopa (add1 a) suma)] [(>= (* a a a b) lim) suma] [else (let loopc ([c 1] [sumc 0]) (define n (+ (* a a a c c b) (* c b b))) (cond [(>= n lim) (loopa (add1 a) (+ suma sumc))] [(hash-has-key? ht n) (loopc (add1 c) (+ sumc n))] [else (loopc (add1 c) sumc)]))])))) ;(require future-visualizer) (define (euler141b) (define lim 1000000000000) (define ht (make-hash)) (for ([i (in-range 1 1000000)]) (hash-set! ht (sqr i) 1)) ; (visualize-futures (let ([f1 (future (λ () (find-progressive-num2 1 1000 4 lim ht)))] [f2 (future (λ () (find-progressive-num2 2 1000 4 lim ht)))] [f3 (future (λ () (find-progressive-num2 3 1000 4 lim ht)))]) (+ (find-progressive-num2 4 1000 4 lim ht) (touch f1) (touch f2) (touch f3)))) On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>wrote: > You might try places. Writing your own gcd seems straightforward. I'm not > sure about integer-sqrt?, tho. Maybe you could make a table or something if > you know there are not that many numbers. > > Or maybe someone will adjust the runtime to make those future safe! > > Robby > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So I should write my own (gcd ) and (square? ) functions? >> >> I can try that, but isn't there a simple way to use threads? >> >> Thanks, >> -Joe >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Robby Findler < >> ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> >>> When I run this, the future visualizer shows that gcd and square-number? >>> block the futures. square-number? is implemented in TR and if you take it, >>> you find that integer-sqrt also blocks the futures. I'm not sure if those >>> functions can be made to run safely in futures or not. >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I have a ProjectEuler problem that I wanted to speed up so I thought I >>>> would try to speed it up with future / touch. >>>> >>>> I tried the following: >>>> >>>> ; function that searches for progressive numbers for a given range of b >>>> values >>>> (define (find-progressive-num b-start b-end b-incr lim) >>>> (for/sum ([b (in-range b-start b-end b-incr)]) >>>> (let loopa ([a (add1 b)] [suma 0]) >>>> (cond >>>> [(> (gcd a b) 1) (loopa (add1 a) suma)] >>>> [(>= (* a a a b) lim) suma] >>>> [else >>>> (let loopc ([c 1] [sumc 0]) >>>> (define n (+ (* a a a c c b) (* c b b))) >>>> (cond >>>> [(>= n lim) (loopa (add1 a) (+ suma sumc))] >>>> [(square-number? n) (loopc (add1 c) (+ sumc n))] >>>> [else (loopc (add1 c) sumc)]))])))) >>>> >>>> ; ProjectEuler problem #141 >>>> ; n = q * d + r >>>> ; q/d = d/r = a/b (where a and b are relatively prime) >>>> ; so d = a*r/b and q = a^2 * r / b^2 >>>> ; since a and b are coprime r must be divisible by b^2 or r = c*b^2 >>>> ; substituting: d = a*c*b and q = a^2*c >>>> ; n = a^3 * c^2 * b + c * b^2 >>>> (define (euler141) >>>> (define lim 10000000000) >>>> (let ([f1 (future (λ () (find-progressive-num 1 1000 2 lim)))]) >>>> (+ (find-progressive-num 2 1000 2 lim) (touch f1)))) >>>> >>>> Unfortunately this runs no faster than the sequential version. I tried >>>> using the future-visualizer but I couldn't understand what it was telling >>>> me (I guess some operation is blocking). I also tried finer grained >>>> threads (one for each value of b), but that did no better. >>>> >>>> Can anyone give me some pointers to successfully using future / touch? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Joe >>>> >>>> ____________________ >>>> Racket Users list: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users