I wrote the Science Collection to support my own knowledge-based simulation work, which is basically the Simulation and Inference collections that are also on PLaneT. The Science Collection basically had what I needed to support that work. We use the code on a daily basis for many analysis applications. I'm hoping to largely deprecate the Science Collection in favor of the new math package over time. [As Neal said, the differential equation solvers are the main thing I need to move over the Typed Racket to be more in line with the rest of the math package.] I am in the process of rewriting the Simulation and Inference collections, too.
I'd be happy to discuss it more if you're interested. Doug On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Konrad Hinsen <[email protected]>wrote: > Matthias Felleisen writes: > > > Did you look at the Science collection on Planet? It's used in a > > commercial product but the producers decided it was worth opening > > the library to the public. -- Matthias > > That one looks quite impressive as well, but it doesn't use > racket/math. In fact, it duplicates much of the functionality, so I > suspect it's an older development from pre-Typed-Racket days. > > Konrad. > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
