On 28/08/13 16:33, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Lawrence Woodman wrote:
I have used: Ruby, Tcl, Shared C Libraries under Linux, Various Linux Distros,
etc. All of these either
started without distinct version control, or started with a single version
package model and now all
support multiple parallel versions of packages to overcome the dependency
problems that arose.
As you may know, we started at the opposite end of the spectrum, PLaneT
(version 1). While PLaneT worked well in some ways, it did not live up to the
original goal of turning drracket into a package. Specifically we wanted to
have an OS-like situation where a kernel can load every desired piece of
library and package from PLaneT to configure itself. Perhaps we didn't try hard
enough or perhaps we overlooked something in this direction, but in this
essential way it didn't work.
This is our second start in the package direction and all I can try to say is
that we tried to learn from PLaneT and from other package systems that we
observed.
I'm going to ... report back if I have any problems.
This is precisely what we would like. We wish to support the full range of
users -- commercial, open source, extreme hobby, and the full range of
educational efforts -- and we are hoping that people speak up when things go
wrong.
From the very beginning of this project in 1994, we made feedback from users
our highest priority and we will continue to do so.
It is certainly something that drew me to Racket and its community. I
think this thread
demonstrates how well devs can take the time to respond to feedback and
patiently
explain a position. Even if the person starting the thread is a bit
grouchy at times.
Thanks
Lorry
--
vLife Systems Ltd
Registered Office: The Meridian, 4 Copthall House, Station Square, Coventry,
CV1 2FL
Registered in England and Wales No. 06477649
http://vlifesystems.com
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
