On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't remember my rationale in detail, but I think it was something > like: a sequence may reflect something the user requested, in which > case it should always interrupt whatever else the user was doing, or > the sequence is not due to a user action, in which case it shouldn't > interrupt the user's actions. > > This makes sense to me (and during my begin-edit-sequence audit I went by "should this count as a separate undo step?"). I do not mean to be disputing this. That is, IMO, shift-left (& co) should not be sensitive to this. It should be sensitive only to "what was the last time that the start and end points of the selection were the same?" (counting a click and drag as first setting the start and end points the same). Robby
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
