got it. But just to confirm port-values in Racket are subject to gc, right? --- Vlad Kozin <[email protected]>
On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Vlad Kozin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Got it. Thanks Sam. >> >> Have a question that I just forgot to ask. There's a reason I have >> (let*-values ..) instead of definitions: > > There isn't a difference between the code you wrote an what I wrote -- > using `define` inside another context just gets transformed into `let` > or `let-values`. > > Sam
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
