Context for my question: I'm working on the Homebrew formula for Racket<https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/pull/22420>, and I'd like to offer a version that has as few dependencies as possible. >From what I've seen of the current state of the repository, it seems like the PLTeam has already adopted the ideas that Matthew Flatt explored in min-racket <https://github.com/mflatt/min-racket>. I've tried to reproduce a similar situation with the 5.3.6 release.
>From all of the packages that are usually installed by default in 5.3.6<https://github.com/plt/racket/tree/ded0c4a8474baa61ac84fb27dfb5353965fb756b/collects>, I selected the following: - compiler - data - db - dynext - ffi - file - json - launcher - net - openssl - pkg - planet - racket - raco - reader - s-exp - setup - syntax - unstable - version - xml So, is this reasonable? Or is it a misguided idea, fated to plunge users of Homebrew into a morass of mysterious errors? Thank you for any guidance, --Josh
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
