> skipped? = #t can only arise if some struct type in the hierarchy is opaque, > which would mean struct? returns #f. If you only care about types that > satisfy struct?, you should be able to safely ignore skipped?, if I > understand it correctly.
Opaque here means, not declared with #:transparent? If so, that would explain something else: The units tests I posted used #:transparent only because copy-pasta. After I posted, I decided to fix that...but then the immutable tests failed. That didn't make much sense to me, but I guess now it does. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
