Thanks! Robby
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu>wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On 2014-01-27 08:40:38 -0800, Eric Dobson wrote: > >> This is likely a bug, but I cannot reproduce using the following > >> program. Do you have a small test case? > > > > I talked to Spencer and we found this example that produces the same > > output: > > > > (module a typed/racket > > (: g ((U (Parameterof (-> Void)) (-> Void)) -> Void)) > > (define (g p) p (void)) > > (provide g)) > > (require 'a) > > (g (make-parameter void)) > > > > It seems to be specific to having a `Parameterof` containing a > > function type unioned with a function type. > > Here's the bug without TR: > > #lang racket > (module b racket > (define (g p) p (void)) > (provide/contract [g > (-> (or/c (parameter/c (-> void?)) > (-> void?)) > void?)])) > (require 'b) > (g (make-parameter void)) > > Gives the error: > > sw/plt/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/blame.rkt:245:0: > default-blame-format: contract violation > expected: a blame object with a non-#f positive field > given: #<blame> > > Sam > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users