Asumu Takikawa writes: > There is not (yet) and I don't know how we will support it if we do. > Right now the only option is to remove interfaces from your code and use > types instead to enforce that methods are implemented. ...
> and so on. Also, I'm not sure interfaces add all that much value when > you have a structural type system like TR does. Interfaces provide functions that dispatch on the type of one of their arguments. I don't see how that can be done with types. Konrad ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
