Yes. One approach is to expand into a program that never runs but that has the identifiers in the binding relationships you want check syntax to show. Another approach is to add properties to your program that tells check syntax what to draw. You can read about the second approach here:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/tools/Check_Syntax.html?q=check%20syntax#%28part._.Syntax_.Properties_that_.Check_.Syntax_.Looks_.For%29 Let us know if you get stuck when you try it! Robby On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Alexander D. Knauth <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any way to use syntax properties or anything like that to tell > DrRacket where to draw the arrows to? > > I’m trying to make my own language and I wanted to be able to have DrRacket > draw the arrows. > > Also is there a way to have it draw multiple arrows, so that for example it > would draw arrows not only to the original definition but also to all of the > expressions that set! it? > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
