Those nondeterministic errors are in the Racket test suite, so probably they wouldn't happen in the rackjure tests.
Sam On Jul 11, 2014 8:10 PM, "Robby Findler" <[email protected]> wrote: > No. But there are non-deterministic failures that travis sometimes > finds, elsewhere in Racket. I didn't see the link to the travis > output. Do you have that handy? > > Robby > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Alexander D. Knauth > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was trying to make docs for ~>% and ~>_ in my fork of rackjure, and > the travis cl builds were passing, > > but then I changed one character in the documentation to fix a typo and > then all of a sudden the build failed. > > All I did was change one % to an _ within a @racketblock so this: > > @racketblock[ > > (~>% #”foobar” bytes-length (number->string _ 16) string->bytes/utf-8) > > ]} > > to this: > > @racketblock[ > > (~>_ #”foobar” bytes-length (number->string _ 16) string->bytes/utf-8) > > ]} > > And then all of a sudden the build failed. > > Is there anything scribble or anything else does that would make this > not work? > > > > https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure/pull/42 > > > https://github.com/AlexKnauth/rackjure/commit/39473e967a186d9a1d53aede461ba95d5bef16ac > > > > > > ____________________ > > Racket Users list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
