I think this is awesome too! Is there some way we can use this to help make Racket better, do you think?
Would it be useful as a test oracle? Is there a way to maybe re-interpret the function definitions (say put them into a different "#lang") you've written to get some kind of a cool random bytecode generator maybe? Something else? Robby On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is awesome, Jens. > > I'd like to have more Racket VMs for experiments like JavaScript and > LLVM (to get on to iOS better?). I wonder if you were able to use the > Whalesong bytecode interpreter during the coding of this? > > Jay > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard <jensa...@soegaard.net> > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> To see how Racket's bytecodes work I have implemented an evaluator in Racket. >> The best feature is the extensive amount of comments. >> >> https://github.com/soegaard/meta/blob/master/runtime/racket-eval.rkt >> >> Comments and patches are welcome, >> Jens Axel Søgaard >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > > > -- > Jay McCarthy > http://jeapostrophe.github.io > > "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, > for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. > And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." > - D&C 64:33 > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
