I had not actually heard of Xvfb before now, but that could be a good solution. I balk at using full X11 with only 512MB of RAM, but that could be enough to satisfy the original code's expectations. I will have to experiment with it.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Amir Ansari <fractall...@csi.com> wrote: > Have you tried Xvfb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xvfb), a virtual X > server? It runs headlessly, sidesteps the whole issue of having to fork the > code... > > Amir > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
