Sam Tobin-Hochstadt writes: > Ah, if you want to create truly cyclic structure with no base case > like this, then you'll have to do more work. Either you'll need to > expand the type of the `x` field in `foo` to allow an initial value, > or you'll need to create a dummy `foo` with that extended type, and > then copy the cyclic data once you've created it to a new version
In my specific application, I ended up replacing the cyclic data structure, which was a singleton, by a function that simulates it. But for another project, which involves graphs, I'll stick to untyped Racket for now. Konrad. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
