When using the optimization coach, it sometimes gives me this message: > This struct constructor is used in hot code. Allocating structs is expensive, > consider using vectors instead. To keep the same interface, consider defining > macro wrappers around the vector operations that have the same name as the > struct constructor and accessors.
Is this really all that accurate? In some simple tests I’ve done, I haven’t found struct allocation to be any more expensive than vector allocation of equivalent size. What are the situations in which this holds to be true? ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
