I wrote something similar for my LLVM bindings, after running into many issues with Dave's code. It follows the c spec not c++, and doesn't support gcc extensions which many libaries use.
It is no where near production quality, but may give you a starting point: https://github.com/shekari/racket-llvm/blob/master/private/llvm-headers.rkt On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Bartosz Przygoda <bprzyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello again, > > Looks like this > <http://docs.racket-lang.org/inside/Writing_Racket_Extensions.html?q=#%28part._.Declaring_a_.Module_in_an_.Extension%29> > ( > http://docs.racket-lang.org/inside/Writing_Racket_Extensions.html?q=#%28part._.Declaring_a_.Module_in_an_.Extension%29) > solves it the way I wanted (and it's quite easy to build, thanks to > documentation). So at worst, I could use an extension (would be very > similar to the way python does it). I said 'at worst', cause it's gonna > involve lots of tedious typing on the C side. > > I'm gonna check out those c parsing libs for that reason. > > Thanks! > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Anthony Carrico <acarr...@memebeam.org> > wrote: > >> On 02/05/2015 05:01 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: >> > Maybe you can find something useful here: >> > http://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/doc/c-utils/index.html >> >> Hey, this is pretty cool. I wonder if Dave Herman has thought of bolting >> this to Clang. >> >> -- >> Anthony Carrico >> >> >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
