Jens Axel Søgaard wrote on 02/24/2015 05:01 PM:
I see that the standard way of embedding Racket is via a dynamic library.
Unfortunately, I wouldn't risk an important app to this Racket embedding approach without a *lot* of prior validation by someone else. (Seems like it might be begging for remote-debugging nightmares, including the possibility of the Racket embedding tickling previously-undiscovered bugs in the host platform that stomp on memory.)
Neil V. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
