Would it make sense to implement solutions for #lang sweet-exp racket ? Alex Knauth
On Apr 28, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Tim Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > I've just done a quick burst of cherry picking tasks on Rosetta > Code (www.rosettacode.org). I took a quick look at: > * http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Tcl > and > * http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Racket > > And they both have the line: > "The following 845 pages are in this category, out of 845 total. " > > I *think* that means that both Tcl and Racket have 845 tasks impemented, > but short of walking down a printout with a pen (and it's far to late to > be doing that) -- I do believe that Tcl and Racket are now jointly the > most popular programming languages on Rosetta Code. > > WELL DONE AND THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED (especially Racket) > CODE ONTO ROSETTA CODE! > > And many, many thanks to the Racket team for producing a language which > is now demonstrably as competent as any. (Although we all knew that before > anyway, didn't we?) > > Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
