Alexis King writes: > > How does this compare to https://github.com/ijp/pfds/ or the work > > described in http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/sfp10-kth.pdf ? > > In the case of the former, that targets R6RS, while this is > intended to be a more “native” Racket solution. The latter is in > Typed Racket, while this is currently in untyped Racket since TR
Thanks for this concise summary, that was exactly what I was hoping for. > In addition to the actual implementation differences, this is also > designed with my generic collections library in mind to test the I just looked at that one and it seems really nice - the Clojure inspiration is hard to miss ;-) I always found Racket's collection to be unpleasant to use because of the many different interfaces, which in particular force programmers to commit to a specific choice early in program design. I'll put both the generic collections and the persistent vectors on my to-do list! Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
