Yes, if you just change `#lang typed/racket/base` to `#lang
typed/racket/base/no-check`, that's what you'll get.

Sam

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:34 PM, John Carmack <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there an option to parse all the type annotations, but not do any of the 
> checking? Highly interactive tuning sessions could work without type 
> checking, then turn it back on for structural work.
>
>
>
>> On Jun 1, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, Typed Racket typechecking is pretty slow, and so the
>> times you have there are not out of the ordinary. The most significant
>> thing that's slow in Typed Racket is type checking numeric operations,
>> because both the numbers themselves and the operations have
>> complicated types.
>>
>> If you can say more about the program in particular, I can maybe
>> suggest something that would speed it up, but it's currently a
>> combination of expensive-in-principle algorithms and not being
>> designed for speed many years ago when I started.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:06 PM, John Carmack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I am working on a little project to remotely drive a VR headset with code
>>> written in Racket as an attempt to make a significantly faster development
>>> environment for certain types of VR apps.  I am worried about what appears
>>> to be the compile speed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It takes over three seconds from hitting ctrl-R in DrRacket to executing the
>>> first statement of a 350 line typed racket program.  It only uses:
>>>
>>> #lang typed/racket/base
>>>
>>> (require racket/tcp)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That seems to be about twice as slow as a larger untyped racket program
>>> using a bunch more stuff, but even that isn’t great:
>>>
>>> #lang racket
>>>
>>> (require 2htdp/universe)
>>>
>>> (require 2htdp/image)
>>>
>>> (require 2htdp/planetcute)
>>>
>>> (require (only-in racket/gui/base play-sound))
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does Run from DrRacket  have a significant time penalty?
>>>
>>> Are there any steps I can take to make typed racket compile faster?
>>>
>>> In many cases I don’t care much about the execution speed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to think that compiling and running a few hundred lines of code
>>> on a modern desktop system should be essentially instant.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Racket Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to