> On Jun 13, 2015, at 7:37 AM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 2015, at 12:18 AM, 'John Clements' via users-redirect > <us...@plt-scheme.org> wrote: > >> Okay, I shouldn’t change topics, but while I’ve got you (guys): it looks >> like (module+ test …) now works in TR, but not when there are imported >> bindings… suppose I have foo.rkt: > > I’ve run into similar problems with module+ before as you did below, but I > found that something like this has worked so far: > (module* test racket/base > (require (submod “..”) rackunit) > … tests here … > )
Ah! Makes perfect sense. The submodule isn’t in typed racket by default. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
