Yes, I guess it is a clipping issue. Along the same lines, I had wanted to make a few plots with the same plot area, but these plots had different width y-axis labels so plot-width and plot-height did not help (neither did padding the smaller labels with "\u00A0").
Can I open some github issues for these? I'd be happy to label myself as "responsible". On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/02/2015 08:37 PM, Benjamin Greenman wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com >> <mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> rounded ends are the only kind that compose nicely when drawn that way >> >> >> Oooh, that's interesting. After sending the first email I'd actually >> gone ahead and hacked make-pen% to always use the square cap -- which >> looked "matplotlib good" for my plots -- and was planning to expose that >> parameter in a pull request. But I won't anymore. >> >> For the record, my actual problem was with 2 specific points: >> >> 1. Plot lines extended slightly past the x/y axes >> > > Is this actually a clipping issue? > > 2. Dashed horizontal rules looked better as square lines >> > > True. So do extra axes, plot boundaries and tick lines. > > I'd be perfectly happy if all the decorations, and renderers that produce > decoration-looking things like axis lines and rules, always used square > caps. Maybe even 2D rectangles and other stuff that always draw just > horizontal and vertical lines. I wouldn't even want a parameter for > changing them back, pursuant to Plot's "looks great without users having to > think about making it look great" design goal. > > Neil ⊥ > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
