I also forgot to reply to the list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Doug Williams" <m.douglas.willi...@gmail.com> Date: Jul 23, 2015 9:21 AM Subject: Re: [racket-users] What limits would you put on racket? To: "Sayth Renshaw" <flebber.c...@gmail.com> Cc:
If you're strictly comparing Racket to other Lisp dialects, I would say there is never any reason to go to a different Lisp dialect. The main exception would be if there is some specific, existing capability in a different language that you require. But, that is not a dialect issue. I regularly use Racket for complex analysis tasks. The mathematic and plotting capabilities available are superior (in my opinion) to other dialects. Your mileage may vary. Doug Williams On Jul 22, 2015 11:51 PM, "Sayth Renshaw" <flebber.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Just getting reacquainted with Racket going back through HTDP 2nd edition > and the edx intro course. > > Is there a point where you would say yeah Racket shouldn't go there, it's > best at A B or C you should go to Chez, Sbcl, CCL etc. > > Sayth > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
