On 08/08/2015 16:59, Matthew Flatt wrote:
The problem here is the same as in
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/H7vilh3KcD4/pGZif3F3dEkJ
Indeed, adding that require line fixes the problem. Thanks!
I still haven't thought about it enough to fine better solution than
putting `require (only-in racket/base #%module-begin))` before the
submodule declaration.
I'll profit from this situation for a feature request that looks somehow
related: it would be nice if I could specify somewhere the bindings for
my module as something other than racket/base. For example "racket" or
"lazy".
In fact, if I write (require racket) instead of (require (only-in
racket/base #%module-begin)), I gain in two ways:
- I get all the bindings I expect.
- It looks much less like a kludge.
It would then make sense to have something like
@bindings[racket]
at the top of my scribble/lp2 module to put this information in a more
prominent place.
Konrad.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
