It makes sense to me to make a printer that uses URL->string. On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, 'John Clements' via Racket Users < racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> It appears to me that the #<url> structure (as e.g. from net/url) is > opaque. Is there any good reason for this? It’s kind of a pain (the default > printer doesn’t show me the fields), and I don’t see any good reason for > it, especially given the existence of url->string. I’d be happy to > formulate this as a pull request... > > John Clements > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
