eq? on symbols is a special part of the specification and that seems benign to me, all things considered. The "giant hash in the sky" that makes sure that works isn't exactly trouble free, but we seem to have it under control.
Robby On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > Robby Findler wrote on 09/17/2015 09:18 PM: >> >> I think that we need to work harder to deemphasize eq?, and warn >> people that, when eq? returns #f, really you learned nothing (like you >> need to pretend you just didn't even call eq?). If it returns #t, then >> you learn something, of course. > > > What about `eq?` (and `memq`) of symbols? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
