> On Oct 12, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Alex Knauth <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Oct 12, 2015, at 8:35 PM, Alexis King <[email protected]> wrote:
>> In the same line of thought as `append-map`, the name `first-sort` has >> crossed my mind, but this feels just as opaque. The name `first-by` is very >> close, but it fails: that function has a meaning closer to `findf` to me, >> not whatever this function is. > > To me, `first-by` doesn't seem like findf. To me it implies the same sort of > first of a sorted list semantics, but without implying that it has to sort > the whole list. That's why I like it almost as much as find-best. Actually, after thinking about it more, first-by makes even more sense. I've renamed it to first-by in the pull request. Alex Knauth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
