Thanks. 1972- now I'm embarrassed !
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 at 20:13, Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:53:50PM +0000, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > I'd prefer to do it in memory. > > Writing to disk just to read it straight back seems like a lot of effort, > > and I lose the ability to make pages that are updated on-the-fly. > > Writing to disk may not cost as much as it seems, since modern operation > systems cache temporary files in memory and they may never reach the > disk. Whether your OS is modern in thie sense I don't know, though. It > was already implemented in VSAM in OS/370. There is still, of course, > system-call overhead. > > -- hendrik > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
