Hi Thomas: thank you for participating in the Racket community and submitting reports that help us improve the docs and the implementation.
Love & Peace, Robby On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Dickerson <thomas_dicker...@brown.edu> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:24:55 AM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> This role of marks has been taken over by macro-introduction scopes, so >> that's still the explanation. A macro-introduction scope is added to >> the right places by first adding it everywhere to the argument to a >> macro transformer, then flipping it everywhere in the transformer's >> result. >> >> (The documentation of `syntax-original?` includes an attempt to specify >> that, but none of the documentation is clear enough yet about scopes.) > > I'm looking at this documentation now ( > http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stxops.html#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._syntax-original~3f%29%29 > ) and see nothing of the sort. Can you specify where this is hypothetically > being communicated? > > > > That the macro stepper simultaneously allows you to click on the syntax in a > remark or local step and see #t for original?, while simultaneously returning > false for syntax-original? is incredibly user hostile. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
