> The objective here is to get a source/loc structure with call point from the > stx passed into the syntax transformer. Is this what quote-srcloc is for?
I haven't had a need to use `quote-srcloc`. Although I don't know the context of what you're trying to do, I wanted to check whether you know about `syntax/loc`? A colloquial Racket macro definition uses `syntax-case` or `syntax-parse`, with patterns and templates (as opposed to "raw" `datum->syntax`). Usually you specify the template using `syntax` or its reader shorthand, `#'`. By substituting `syntax/loc`, you can specify the source location of the resulting syntax object. I wrote a couple of blog posts about my experience using `syntax/loc`: http://www.greghendershott.com/2014/01/using-syntax-loc-and-unit-test-macros.html http://www.greghendershott.com/2014/01/using-syntax-loc.html Apologies in advance if that's not helpful for what you're trying to do. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
