On 2016-01-05 14:39:17 -0500, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: > Asumu, does this make sense to you? Note that in particular, I think that a > warning at the top of the pfds package wouldn’t have helped me; I think a > warning at the top of each pfds page would make a lot more sense.
I'd be happy to take a pull request for this. Though I'd also prefer that the library just worked well. The pfds could library could also just export everything without contracts unsafely. Alternatively we could set it up to generate untyped variants of each (with a different module path) that don't optimize or use contracts. Cheers, Asumu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
