On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Matthew Butterick <m...@mbtype.com> wrote:
> When you put it that way, subjectively it still sounds good. I'd use it. > But objectively I can't foresee that it would be a wise investment of > anyone's Racket time. Let's face it: any web framework is lucky to live 5 > yrs before developers tire of it and move onto the next thing, or browser > changes make it obsolete. > The shifting of the underlying platform is inevitable -- perhaps eventually it will settle down -- and empirically your point about web-frameworks checks out, suggesting that it would be unwise to bake in reliance on any particular framework. That said, I reckon that there are gains to be made via making use of existing JavaScript frameworks and libraries. OTOH: Here's a new example from Jens that has zero dependencies on external JS - a simple Space Invaders game in Urlang: http://soegaard.github.io/urlang/space-invaders.html Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
