No, I did not mention that option, but it has crossed my mind. At this moment I am reading Julia Lawall's notion of “leakage”. Thanks, Jos.
_____ From: Matthias Felleisen [mailto:matth...@ccs.neu.edu] Sent: sábado, 28 de mayo de 2016 14:56 To: Jos Koot Cc: Racket Users Subject: Re: [racket-users] check-duplicates On May 27, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Jos Koot <jos.k...@gmail.com> wrote: Many more options are open. Here is one you didn’t mention, going back to Julia Lawall's notion of “leakage”: pass in a success (sk) and failure (fk) continuation so that the “outside” does not have to recoup the decision that check-duplicates already made. — Mattihas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
