If you write (struct point (x y))
then `point` is bound as syntax that both expands to the `point` constructor and provides static information about the point` structure (as used, for example, by `match`). You could avoid the indirection through syntax, sacrificing static information, by adding `#:omit-define-syntaxes`: (struct point (x y) #:omit-define-syntaxes) For what it's worth, I recommend avoiding `namespace-variable-value`. There's usually a better way, but it depends on what you're trying to do. At Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT), "Matt A. Peerson" wrote: > Hi, > > When I define a struct (named e.g. "point") and use namespace-variable-value > in REPL it gives the error: namespace-variable-value: bound to syntax in: > point > > Is this normal? (although even if it is, it'll force me to use class > definitions for my structs in my current project). > > Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
