If you write (struct point (x y))
then `point` is bound as syntax that both expands to the `point` constructor and provides static information about the point` structure (as used, for example, by `match`). You could avoid the indirection through syntax, sacrificing static information, by adding `#:omit-define-syntaxes`: (struct point (x y) #:omit-define-syntaxes) For what it's worth, I recommend avoiding `namespace-variable-value`. There's usually a better way, but it depends on what you're trying to do. At Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT), "Matt A. Peerson" wrote: > Hi, > > When I define a struct (named e.g. "point") and use namespace-variable-value > in REPL it gives the error: namespace-variable-value: bound to syntax in: > point > > Is this normal? (although even if it is, it'll force me to use class > definitions for my structs in my current project). > > Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
