On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jon Zeppieri <zeppi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Note that this function still generates a list as output. I suppose it > could instead generate as many values as there are initial elements of xs, > Uh, and you can disregard this statement altogether, since it's crazy [sorry]. `foldl*`, like `foldl`, does not need to generate a list as output. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.