Would a database work for you? SQLite ( https://docs.racket-lang.org/db/connect.html#%28def._%28%28lib._db%2Fmain..rkt%29._sqlite3-connect%29%29) is dead easy and very convenient. Their maximum DB size is 140TB, so they won't have an issue with a few gigs.
Dave On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Schuster <schus...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > I have some large (several GB worth) sets of values I'd like to persist > across debugging runs of a program, rather than recomputing them each time. > I'm currently doing this with the built-in "read" and "write", but is there > a more efficient method, especially for reading the data back in? > > I could of course come up with some kind of custom encoding, but that's > likely not worth the effort in my case, so I'm wondering if there's any > general purpose method already available in Racket (or in a package). > > Thanks, > Jon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
